diff -r ffa851df0825 -r 2fb8b9db1c86 symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/python-2.6.1/Demo/metaclasses/Eiffel.py
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/python-2.6.1/Demo/metaclasses/Eiffel.py	Fri Jul 31 15:01:17 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+"""Support Eiffel-style preconditions and postconditions.
+
+For example,
+
+class C:
+    def m1(self, arg):
+        require arg > 0
+        return whatever
+        ensure Result > arg
+
+can be written (clumsily, I agree) as:
+
+class C(Eiffel):
+    def m1(self, arg):
+        return whatever
+    def m1_pre(self, arg):
+        assert arg > 0
+    def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
+        assert Result > arg
+
+Pre- and post-conditions for a method, being implemented as methods
+themselves, are inherited independently from the method.  This gives
+much of the same effect of Eiffel, where pre- and post-conditions are
+inherited when a method is overridden by a derived class.  However,
+when a derived class in Python needs to extend a pre- or
+post-condition, it must manually merge the base class' pre- or
+post-condition with that defined in the derived class', for example:
+
+class D(C):
+    def m1(self, arg):
+        return arg**2
+    def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
+        C.m1_post(self, Result, arg)
+        assert Result < 100
+
+This gives derived classes more freedom but also more responsibility
+than in Eiffel, where the compiler automatically takes care of this.
+
+In Eiffel, pre-conditions combine using contravariance, meaning a
+derived class can only make a pre-condition weaker; in Python, this is
+up to the derived class.  For example, a derived class that takes away
+the requirement that arg > 0 could write:
+
+    def m1_pre(self, arg):
+        pass
+
+but one could equally write a derived class that makes a stronger
+requirement:
+
+    def m1_pre(self, arg):
+        require arg > 50
+
+It would be easy to modify the classes shown here so that pre- and
+post-conditions can be disabled (separately, on a per-class basis).
+
+A different design would have the pre- or post-condition testing
+functions return true for success and false for failure.  This would
+make it possible to implement automatic combination of inherited
+and new pre-/post-conditions.  All this is left as an exercise to the
+reader.
+
+"""
+
+from Meta import MetaClass, MetaHelper, MetaMethodWrapper
+
+class EiffelMethodWrapper(MetaMethodWrapper):
+
+    def __init__(self, func, inst):
+        MetaMethodWrapper.__init__(self, func, inst)
+        # Note that the following causes recursive wrappers around
+        # the pre-/post-condition testing methods.  These are harmless
+        # but inefficient; to avoid them, the lookup must be done
+        # using the class.
+        try:
+            self.pre = getattr(inst, self.__name__ + "_pre")
+        except AttributeError:
+            self.pre = None
+        try:
+            self.post = getattr(inst, self.__name__ + "_post")
+        except AttributeError:
+            self.post = None
+
+    def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
+        if self.pre:
+            apply(self.pre, args, kw)
+        Result = apply(self.func, (self.inst,) + args, kw)
+        if self.post:
+            apply(self.post, (Result,) + args, kw)
+        return Result
+
+class EiffelHelper(MetaHelper):
+    __methodwrapper__ = EiffelMethodWrapper
+
+class EiffelMetaClass(MetaClass):
+    __helper__ = EiffelHelper
+
+Eiffel = EiffelMetaClass('Eiffel', (), {})
+
+
+def _test():
+    class C(Eiffel):
+        def m1(self, arg):
+            return arg+1
+        def m1_pre(self, arg):
+            assert arg > 0, "precondition for m1 failed"
+        def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
+            assert Result > arg
+    x = C()
+    x.m1(12)
+##    x.m1(-1)
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    _test()